Written 3 years ago - "Digital Kills the Retailing Stars" was written in the aftermath of the collapse of Woolworths in the UK. Given all the changes kicking around at the moment, I thought it was worth dusting off and sharing. No apologies for the length....have a coffee...
Two things I didn't foresee: Tesco Hudl - an undoubted product success and the rise of pound stores.....Let me know what you think, all comments appreciated....enjoy!
Digital Kills the Retailing Stars
The future of retail as we know
it is hanging in the balance. From Cheshunt to China, digital is reshaping the
course of retail developments. There are
particular dynamics in emerging economies with little historic exposure to Western
retailing norms and the questioning logic is “to what extent will they need and/or
acquire them? “ It is different in mature economies where big box is the common
retail denominator, isn’t it?
4 connected
ideas are emerging and joining up the dots creates some fascinating pictures.
Of course this won’t be a universal pattern but it provides a coherent sense of
retailing in the post-modern phase and it is a future that is rapidly approaching.
1. Digital Tsunami
There appears to be a digital
tsunami inexorably moving, albeit at different paces, throughout the retail
universe. Plausibly, the forces
inhibiting big box development in China will simultaneously sweep away
irrelevant, non-value adding retail in mature markets.
Picture a huge tidal
wave overwhelming all that stands in its path. Two groups of mature retailers
are already feeling the full force of this surging power:
- Retailers
whose businesses have an easy propensity to be purchased on-line. We have
already experienced and/or are in the midst of witnessing a fundamental
reshaping of retail categories including Music & Entertainment, Books,
Gambling, Insurance, Consumer Electronics, Travel, Property, Greetings Cards
and Banking etc
- Retailers whose business model was so fragile that
any material loss of revenue was sufficient to push them over the edge. In the
UK, perhaps the earliest casualty was the Woolworth’s group that collapsed in
2008/09 as their Music and Entertainment sales evaporated under the Apple /
Amazon revolution, disrupting their total commerciality. And we know there are
many lining up to join them like Jane Norman, Comet, Carpetright et al
This is a
hungry tide and no one knows where its path will lead and how much land will be
consumed. But as with all seismic
shifts, the landscape is being irrevocably resculpted.
2.
What happens when your greatest strength becomes your Achilles heel?#
The seeds of this question are
sown in the post-apocalyptic fall-out that follows the demise of these early
casualties and it comes with the realization that retailing is, de-facto, a fragile
model.
For many years, major suppliers
have invested time in training their own people and developing presentations to
justify why manufacturers’ margins are justifiably so much stronger than
retailers. Manufacturers invest in new technologies they need to fund R&D;
major retailing is a scale cash business – so focus on cash generation, GMROII
etc and be satisfied with low single digit margins.
The trouble is, no one considered
what might happen when business starts flowing from mature big boxes? How much
contraction can be tolerated before even the best retailers hit Gladwellian “Tipping Points?” The best worst-case scenario, sees retailers
like Tesco build strong on-line propositions – but this doesn’t necessarily
help.
Retailing is a “Stock, Pack, Pick, Pay,
Ship” business. It moves products from suppliers to retail distribution centres (Stock) on onwards to store shelves (Pack); from shelves to shopping
baskets (Pick); through the tills (Pay) and to the shoppers home (Ship). Conventionally, off-line retailers absorb the larger part of the Stock, Pack
and Pay activities; whilst shoppers bear the burden of Pick and Ship. In recent years, a
good deal of technology has been applied by retailers to bring their costs down – e.g. Cross-docking, Shelf Ready Packaging, Ship to Display Pallets and Self-Serve Tills help bring down significant chunks of the cost model. ”
With on-line retailing, major
grocers have to take on Pack, Pick and Ship with decreasing ability, in the
face of rising competition, to pass any of the cost increases back. (Initiatives
like Tesco’s “Click and Collect” – dressed as a shopper benefit, are really
just attempts to put the “Ship” costs back into the shoppers pocket). Under such conditions, even growing sales
from competitors is likely to be margin dilutive. Once you start including the spiralling costs of promotions into the retailers economics, it becomes quickly
evident how, even profitable, business models can be undermined by relatively
small on-line volume shifts.
And there’s another problem.
Where to do the picking? If it’s a store pick based model, it is cost-additive
and margin dilutive. If you go the dark-store route, it drives sales out of
existing outlets. Either way, it is bad news.
Second, many major retailers
expanded their businesses by entering non-grocery categories – many of which
are in the previous list of digitally transformed businesses. Whilst they looked opportunistic in
pre-tsunami times, they are part of the risk to be contained from now on – and
will be the first areas where business loss will be experienced.
All these factors are concerning but
the real “aha moment” centres on the historic strength of major retailers; the real
estate footprint. Millions of retail square footage and with it the ability to
serve millions of shoppers every day from prime retail locations.
Having spent decades building
land-banks and property portfolios, it is common practice for major retailers
to leverage the value of these assets by entering into sale and leaseback
agreements with property developers. This takes assets off the retail balance
sheets, provides investment capital and commits the retailers to long term
leases with guaranteed annual rental escalation formulas.
Here is a
recent example from January 2011
Prupim has completed the £125m purchase of three supermarkets on a
sale-and-leaseback basis for M&G’s Secured Property Income Fund. The real
estate fund manager has bought three Sainsbury’s superstores in Worcester,
Truro and Huddersfield. The leases at stores are for 25 years, with RPI-linked
rent reviews. Source: PropertyWeek.com
But it’s not
a new phenomenon. A similar article in 2004 noted
Tesco yesterday raised more cash for acquisitions by selling off
33 of its UK stores for £650m. The stores, which range in size, have been sold
to a joint venture that is half owned by Tesco and real estate firm Topland.
Tesco has also sold two distribution centres in the deal. Tesco's £650m cash
will come from issuing bond debt, which will be secured on the rent that it
will begin to pay for the properties. Tesco will rent the stores on a long
leasehold and carry on running the operations, so customers will not see any
change. Topland, has done similar sale
and leaseback deals with retailers Marks & Spencer, Littlewoods and
Budgens. The
Guardian, Tuesday 23
March 2004
Taking the UK as an example, the implication
of a significant retail contraction and
the exodus of household brands from the high street, may well be falling commercial
retail property value and rental costs. With commodity prices still having the
potential to fuel cost price inflation, this is not a great moment to find
yourself with long-leases, large stores, lots of them, increasing on-line
competition and guaranteed inflation-linked rental increases.
It creates a toxic mix where major retailers
may find themselves unable to operate stores profitably and unable to
affordably close them. They could try and renegotiate the rents – but why would
property companies who bought the assets in a much stronger climate want to
deal? Their only dependable asset is the
rental income.
Suddenly, retailers’ biggest assets become a major headache,
underpinning a structural erosion of the competitive model and reducing their
abilities to respond to newer, trimmer more agile competitors unencumbered by
these legacy challenges.
Put simply:
Big box retail in mature markets is under threat.
Really? Tesco? Game Over?? Accepting this is
a rather extreme proposition, it’s worth considering what Philip Clarke, the
new Tesco CEO, said to the British Retail Consortium in his key note address
last month (June 2011)
“….in this digital world, great service, value,
convenience, price – these things are no longer enough to win
customers’ loyalty. More than ever before, customers’ decisions about what they
buy are likely to be influenced by the power of brands”
This could have come straight from
the mouths of AG Laffley or Paul Polman.
But it didn’t. It came from a top global retailer and its conclusions are far
reaching. First, Clarke implicitly acknowledges some of the retail challenges we
set out above. Second, if you follow through with this stream of consciousness,
it has the potential to destabilize the Tesco model as we currently understand
it.
Even aspiring to be the best
retailer in the world, is not enough for Clarke. Tesco’s future is as a brand
builder and he goes on to reference, by example, the importance of the Technika
house brand as a lead play in Tesco’s consumer electronics business. Clarke
goes further: his new strategy for Tesco
includes the expansion of Tesco services to more parts of its footprint.
So brand building for Clarke means building
the Tesco retail brand, stretching it further and wider across more services
and markets, whilst developing and supporting Category specific sub-brand
propositions. Tesco already has its fair share of critics, uneasy about its UK
market strength and others who believe that its ubiquity and utilitarian
ambitions, trying to be all things to all people, risks mushing it into a mire
of muddled mediocrity.
As if to push the point harder, days
after Clarke’s speech, Tesco committed a major faux pas in mishandling the
transfer of Tesco Bank Accounts from RBS, leaving thousands of customers
without access to their funds. BBC Radio 4s Money Box programme featured the
problem and despite Tesco’s best attempts to front up and downplay the issues,
there was no mistaking the customer anger. Many vocalised their intention to
cease banking with Tesco.
And here’s the rub. The broader your
brand, the more equity management required and the more potential for fowl ups.
Once your PR starts turning negative it’s hard to recover. Ask Gordon
Brown. Long before we consider the real
prospects of success of Tesco taking on the likes of Samsung and LG and winning
the consumer electronics war with their house brand, Tesco’s ubiquity may yet turn
out to be their Achilles heel and Philip Clarke’s brand build plans, one
stretch too far. So whilst, I am only half serious in sounding the death knell
for the folks at Cheshunt – they have more challenges ahead of them, and
tougher ones, than they’ve encountered in the last twenty years.
4.
Brands reclaiming ownership
of the consumer/shopper relationship
Don’t get me wrong, I might disagree
with Philip Clarke’s response, but he has put his finger on another massive
challenge for today’s retail giants: “Who owns the shopper?” For the last
fifteen years we have all been working with a simple governing dynamic : “retailers,
having become more powerful, can and do exercise a great deal of influence over
shoppers and act as, crucial and not necessarily
benign, interlocutors, in the parley between brands and consumers”.
Across the globe, major
manufacturers engage with customers to protect their brand positions. P&G
have long-since made an art of this and way before concepts like “shopper based
value creation” were born, Tom Muccio was leading the first WalMart/P&G
Global team with 140+ P&G associates based in Bentonville. P&G decided to excel in this space out of
necessity, not desire – their hearts were and will always be with the brands,
consumers and shoppers. Customers were
recognized as critical arbiters of brand success. Put simply: engage or die.
And if you are going to engage: engage and win.
Digital presents opportunities to
stimulate fundamental shifts in the power balance in the battle for ownership of
consumer and shopper relationships, enabling brand owners to reach shoppers and
consumers with more precision than ever before and reclaiming a bigger stake of
the profit pool. Digital media and
social networks Where historic brand communications were broad-brush and one
directional, today they can be ongoing, multi-layered sets of intimate
dialogues. Retail hegemony is no longer a given. The rules are there to be
rewritten and P&G is keen to author them.
The shifting of vast amounts of
money into digital advertising and communications is no surprise. Their desire
to invest in more forward looking rather than rear view research is instructive;
but it is their eagerness to understand all things retail - on-line retail via,
initially Ocado in the UK , the e-store in the USA, Tide Launderettes, The
Amazing Shave stores, Branded Car Washes - that represents something of a qualitatively
different order.
It is widely rumoured, P&G would like to see c15% of their global
sales operating on a direct to consumer model within a medium term span - (and
why not, after all, two of their global competitors, Avon* and Amway** have never put their products anywhere near a
Walmart store). This is no thirty-minute diversionary tactic – this is game
changing for the next thirty years
If Philip Clarke thinks Tesco needs
to be a brand builder, perhaps P&G reckons they can regain control of their
own destiny by mastering on-line retail and capturing consumer/shopper
relationships in ways previously undreamed of. You don’t need the square
footage – you just need great product , effective ongoing consumer / shopper relationships,
backed up with stunning fulfillment. Amazon began with books and today they
sell.....
The consumer relationship
renaissance, commercial opportunities for suppliers and the value implications
for shoppers could prove an irresistible combination as economies downshift and
consumers seek ever improved value. Such innovations will suck more volume out
of the established retail environment and even retailing goliaths may be
toppled by digital slingshots.
Digital may not have quite killed
the retailing stars yet, it has claimed an increasing number of b-listed actors,
and the waters are still rising. In 10
years we might be asking “Do you remember when Tesco had superstores? In 20
years, “Do you remember Tesco?” And, as
with all tsunami’s, by the time you see it for sure, it’s way too late.
For United, the arrival of Abramovitch at Chelsea brought the
first high profile billionaire in to the public glare but it is Sheikh
Mansoor's arrival at Manchester City and his impending purchase of a new NYC
MLS franchise that changed the game. At the same time the Qatari's bought Paris
Saint Germain in France and spent $145m on new players last season. United, in
transition, have been caught flat-footed.
In mass retail, Tesco are being outplayed by international
competitors. Aldi and Lidl from continental Europe, Walmart in USA and UK. But
it's the new, next generation giants Amazon and Alibaba that threaten to
overwhelm mass retail globally. Tesco have plenty of ideas; possibly too many, without the bandwidth to deliver. Last week's announcement of the decision to
open seven F&F Franchise stores in Boston was dwarfed by Uniqlo's declared
intention for global fashion domination.
Tesco has similar problems. Last weekend's heavyweight papers were
filled with negative critique. Journalists are talking with fund managers: they
speak of leadership replacements. The narrative is who and when, not if.
Interestingly, former Tesco executive Tim Mason, fancied by some as
Clarke's replacement, broke his fifteen month twitter silence last week,
referencing two damning articles on Clarke's reign. The jockeying is well and
truly under way.
Tesco has similar problems. Last weekend's heavyweight papers were
filled with negative critique. Journalists are talking with fund managers: they
speak of leadership replacements. The narrative is who and when, not if.
Interestingly, former Tesco executive Tim Mason, fancied by some as
Clarke's replacement, broke his fifteen month twitter silence last week,
referencing two damning articles on Clarke's reign. The jockeying is well and
truly under way.
